DEFINING
SUPERIOR PERFORMANCE
"Having" vs.
"Doing"
Too many hiring managers create job descriptions that are really laundry lists of
candidate "requirements." When these lists drive the interview process, hiring
results suffer. The selection process becomes focused on what candidates must
"have" to get the job, instead of what candidates must "do" once theyre
on the job. Its difficult to hire superior performers in these scenarios because
theres no definition of what superior performance is.
The Critical First Step to
Hiring the Best
Why is defining superior performance so important? You can spend your candidate interview
time discussing past accomplishments that are related to the performance youre
seeking. The entire interviewing process becomes a much saner, more enjoyable, and much
more productive experience on both sides of the table. And youll find its much
easier to recognize superior candidates when youve painted a clear picture of
"superior performance."
Getting Started with Major
Objectives
So how do you get started? Begin by revising standard job descriptions, using language
that defines superior performance. Heres how:
- Make a list of the top 5-8 things a
person must do to be successful in the job. These are performance objectives. Focus only on Major Objectives and the interim
steps necessary to achieve these objectives. These could include problems to solve,
changes to make, team/management objectives, and technical objectives.
- Take a look at your current job
description in light of the list youve created, and convert each "having"
requirement into an action-oriented "doing" task.
- Put these deliverables into priority
order. Tasks are much easier to
prioritize than arbitrary lists of skills and experience.
Add
Supporting Objectives
Once you set up the Major Objectives for each job, you'll also want to touch on some
Supporting Objectives (such as the key steps needed to meet major objectives). You could
include some of the following:
Management or organizational
issues
- Changes and improvements you'd like to
see implemented
- Problems that might arise (or problems
that already exist)
- Technical issues
- Team and people issues
- Projects and deliverables
Get
S.M.A.R.T.
Once your job description is
defined in terms of the tasks you want the employee to do, youll need to take each
task and turn it into a S.M.A.R.T. objective.
S.M.A.R.T. objectives are:
Specific
Measurable
Action-oriented
Results-focused
TTime-based
There are three approaches to
developing and using SMART objectives. You can use these approaches separately or--even
better--all together to prepare a complete performance profile for each position to be
filled.
- The Macro Approach works best for jobs
with lots of projects. This is
also known as "The Big Picture" approach, one that has as its subtext the
question "What will the incumbent need to do to be successful?" Write measurable
objectives for each major job factor, and be sure that supporting objectives are covered.
- The Micro Approach works well for
technical positions, where theres often a gap between the "having" and the
"doing." Convert
each job requirement or skill listed on a traditional job description into a SMART
objective by asking what the candidate has done with that particular job requirement or
skill.
- The Benchmarking Approach works for
positions that depend more on process/transaction than on task/project. Examine your best performers in the position
youre trying to fill. Determine what these high-performance employees do that makes
them effective, and then make these actions the criteria for your SMART objectives. By
drawing only on those who already do the job exceptionally well, you avoid defining
performance based on the habits of under-performers who hold the same job title.
Finding the language to
articulate your SMART objectives takes some effort and practice--but it pays off in better
hiring decisions. You should express performance goals with these elements in mind:
Examples:
Increase, change, improve
- A specific, measurable goal.
This
is where you address desired results and a timeframe.
Example:
10% improvement in 90 days
Sometimes you won't have all the information
necessary to complete each performance objective, but its worth the effort to get as
close as you can. Complete SMART objectives are the most effective because they make
expectations clear to everyone involved.
Now
that you know how to define superior performance, youre much more likely to hire
superior performers as you go through the selection process. After all, isnt it a
lot easier to find something when you can describe what youre looking for?
Top of Page
National
Executive Personnel
and Marketing Group, L.C.
12734 Kenwood Lane, Suite 73
Fort Myers, FL 33907-5638
(239) 931-0200 Voice
(239) 931-2040 Fax
Email: Search@NationalExecutivePersonnel.com
Website design by
Copyright © 1999
National Executive Personnel and Marketing, L.C.
All Rights Reserved.
Use of this site signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use
Version 1.0 March 05, 2003.
|